Commanders Act TrustCommander vs Complianz
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each cookie compliance technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. Complianz has roughly 1129x more sites overall (426 vs 481K). But the split flips by market: Commanders Act TrustCommander over-indexes in France, Hungary and Thailand, while Complianz runs the majority in Denmark, Finland and Brazil. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is Commanders Act TrustCommander's 0% global share, so bars past it lean Commanders Act TrustCommander.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for Commanders Act TrustCommander
Build for Complianz
Germany is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 100.1K Complianz sites to 49 on Commanders Act TrustCommander, a 100% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose Commanders Act TrustCommander if
- ✓You sell into France, Hungary and Thailand, where it has real traction.
- ✓You value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Commanders Act TrustCommander stack.
Choose Complianz if
- ✓You operate in Denmark, Finland and Brazil, its heartland.
- ✓You want the larger install base (481K sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Complianz stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using Commanders Act TrustCommander or Complianz with emails, socials and country filters.