Commanders Act TrustCommander vs CookieYes
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each cookie compliance technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. CookieYes has roughly 1842x more sites overall (426 vs 784.5K). But the split flips by market: Commanders Act TrustCommander over-indexes in Indonesia, China and Singapore, while CookieYes runs the majority in Brazil, Denmark and Finland. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is Commanders Act TrustCommander's 0% global share, so bars past it lean Commanders Act TrustCommander.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for Commanders Act TrustCommander
Build for CookieYes
Italy is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 70.2K CookieYes sites to 10 on Commanders Act TrustCommander, a 100% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose Commanders Act TrustCommander if
- ✓You sell into Indonesia, China and Singapore, where it has real traction.
- ✓You value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Commanders Act TrustCommander stack.
Choose CookieYes if
- ✓You operate in Brazil, Denmark and Finland, its heartland.
- ✓You want the larger install base (784.5K sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the CookieYes stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using Commanders Act TrustCommander or CookieYes with emails, socials and country filters.