Sucuri vs Content Delivery Network
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each cdn technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. Content Delivery Network has roughly 307x more sites overall (41.4K vs 12.7M). But the split flips by market: Sucuri over-indexes in Romania, Poland and Iran, while Content Delivery Network runs the majority in Japan, Korea and China. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is Sucuri's 0% global share, so bars past it lean Sucuri.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for Sucuri
Build for Content Delivery Network
United States is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 1M Content Delivery Network sites to 2.6K on Sucuri, a 100% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose Sucuri if
- ✓You sell into Romania, Poland and Iran, where it has real traction.
- ✓You value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Sucuri stack.
Choose Content Delivery Network if
- ✓You operate in Japan, Korea and China, its heartland.
- ✓You want the larger install base (12.7M sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Content Delivery Network stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using Sucuri or Content Delivery Network with emails, socials and country filters.