Essential Blocks for Gutenberg vs Facebook
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each widgets technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. Facebook has roughly 468x more sites overall (35.9K vs 16.8M). But the split flips by market: Essential Blocks for Gutenberg over-indexes in Colombia, India and Indonesia, while Facebook runs the majority in Ukraine, Japan and Viet Nam. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is Essential Blocks for Gutenberg's 0% global share, so bars past it lean Essential Blocks for Gutenberg.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for Essential Blocks for Gutenberg
Build for Facebook
United States is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 1.4M Facebook sites to 2.5K on Essential Blocks for Gutenberg, a 100% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose Essential Blocks for Gutenberg if
- ✓You sell into Colombia, India and Indonesia, where it has real traction.
- ✓You value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Essential Blocks for Gutenberg stack.
Choose Facebook if
- ✓You operate in Ukraine, Japan and Viet Nam, its heartland.
- ✓You want the larger install base (16.8M sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Facebook stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using Essential Blocks for Gutenberg or Facebook with emails, socials and country filters.