Essential Blocks for Gutenberg vs Twitter
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each widgets technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. Twitter has roughly 237x more sites overall (35.9K vs 8.5M). But the split flips by market: Essential Blocks for Gutenberg over-indexes in Pakistan, Malaysia and Colombia, while Twitter runs the majority in Japan, Turkey and Viet Nam. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is Essential Blocks for Gutenberg's 0% global share, so bars past it lean Essential Blocks for Gutenberg.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for Essential Blocks for Gutenberg
Build for Twitter
United States is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 761.3K Twitter sites to 2.5K on Essential Blocks for Gutenberg, a 100% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose Essential Blocks for Gutenberg if
- ✓You sell into Pakistan, Malaysia and Colombia, where it has real traction.
- ✓You value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Essential Blocks for Gutenberg stack.
Choose Twitter if
- ✓You operate in Japan, Turkey and Viet Nam, its heartland.
- ✓You want the larger install base (8.5M sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Twitter stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using Essential Blocks for Gutenberg or Twitter with emails, socials and country filters.