GTM4WP vs Facebook
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each widgets technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. Facebook has roughly 42x more sites overall (396.1K vs 16.8M). But the split flips by market: GTM4WP over-indexes in Israel, Netherlands and Poland, while Facebook runs the majority in Korea, Russian Federation and Viet Nam. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is GTM4WP's 2% global share, so bars past it lean GTM4WP.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for GTM4WP
Build for Facebook
United States is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 1.4M Facebook sites to 35.8K on GTM4WP, a 98% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose GTM4WP if
- ✓You sell into Israel, Netherlands and Poland, where it has real traction.
- ✓You value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the GTM4WP stack.
Choose Facebook if
- ✓You operate in Korea, Russian Federation and Viet Nam, its heartland.
- ✓You want the larger install base (16.8M sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Facebook stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using GTM4WP or Facebook with emails, socials and country filters.