Gtranslate for Wordpress vs Facebook
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each widgets technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. Facebook has roughly 89x more sites overall (189.5K vs 16.8M). But the split flips by market: Gtranslate for Wordpress over-indexes in China, Spain and Colombia, while Facebook runs the majority in Finland, Korea and Taiwan. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is Gtranslate for Wordpress's 1% global share, so bars past it lean Gtranslate for Wordpress.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for Gtranslate for Wordpress
Build for Facebook
United States is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 1.4M Facebook sites to 14.7K on Gtranslate for Wordpress, a 99% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose Gtranslate for Wordpress if
- ✓You sell into China, Spain and Colombia, where it has real traction.
- ✓You value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Gtranslate for Wordpress stack.
Choose Facebook if
- ✓You operate in Finland, Korea and Taiwan, its heartland.
- ✓You want the larger install base (16.8M sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Facebook stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using Gtranslate for Wordpress or Facebook with emails, socials and country filters.