Page Links To vs Facebook
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each widgets technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. Facebook has roughly 155x more sites overall (108.1K vs 16.8M). But the split flips by market: Page Links To over-indexes in Singapore, Iran and Israel, while Facebook runs the majority in Viet Nam, Argentina and Ukraine. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is Page Links To's 1% global share, so bars past it lean Page Links To.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for Page Links To
Build for Facebook
United States is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 1.4M Facebook sites to 17.7K on Page Links To, a 99% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose Page Links To if
- ✓You sell into Singapore, Iran and Israel, where it has real traction.
- ✓You value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Page Links To stack.
Choose Facebook if
- ✓You operate in Viet Nam, Argentina and Ukraine, its heartland.
- ✓You want the larger install base (16.8M sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Facebook stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using Page Links To or Facebook with emails, socials and country filters.