Simple Membership vs Facebook
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each widgets technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. Facebook has roughly 856x more sites overall (19.6K vs 16.8M). But the split flips by market: Simple Membership over-indexes in Japan, Germany and Switzerland, while Facebook runs the majority in Viet Nam, Ukraine and Turkey. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is Simple Membership's 0% global share, so bars past it lean Simple Membership.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for Simple Membership
Build for Facebook
United States is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 1.4M Facebook sites to 1.3K on Simple Membership, a 100% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose Simple Membership if
- ✓You sell into Japan, Germany and Switzerland, where it has real traction.
- ✓You value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Simple Membership stack.
Choose Facebook if
- ✓You operate in Viet Nam, Ukraine and Turkey, its heartland.
- ✓You want the larger install base (16.8M sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Facebook stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using Simple Membership or Facebook with emails, socials and country filters.