Social Share Buttons by Supsystic vs Facebook
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each widgets technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. Facebook has roughly 11291x more sites overall (1.5K vs 16.8M). But the split flips by market: Social Share Buttons by Supsystic over-indexes in Greece, Russian Federation and Italy, while Facebook runs the majority in Taiwan, Malaysia and Colombia. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is Social Share Buttons by Supsystic's 0% global share, so bars past it lean Social Share Buttons by Supsystic.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for Social Share Buttons by Supsystic
Build for Facebook
United States is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 1.4M Facebook sites to 97 on Social Share Buttons by Supsystic, a 100% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose Social Share Buttons by Supsystic if
- ✓You sell into Greece, Russian Federation and Italy, where it has real traction.
- ✓You value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Social Share Buttons by Supsystic stack.
Choose Facebook if
- ✓You operate in Taiwan, Malaysia and Colombia, its heartland.
- ✓You want the larger install base (16.8M sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Facebook stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using Social Share Buttons by Supsystic or Facebook with emails, socials and country filters.