ThirstyAffiliates vs Facebook
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each widgets technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. Facebook has roughly 1192x more sites overall (14.1K vs 16.8M). But the split flips by market: ThirstyAffiliates over-indexes in Sweden, Netherlands and Finland, while Facebook runs the majority in Turkey, Korea and Argentina. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is ThirstyAffiliates's 0% global share, so bars past it lean ThirstyAffiliates.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for ThirstyAffiliates
Build for Facebook
United States is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 1.4M Facebook sites to 608 on ThirstyAffiliates, a 100% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose ThirstyAffiliates if
- ✓You sell into Sweden, Netherlands and Finland, where it has real traction.
- ✓You value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the ThirstyAffiliates stack.
Choose Facebook if
- ✓You operate in Turkey, Korea and Argentina, its heartland.
- ✓You want the larger install base (16.8M sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Facebook stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using ThirstyAffiliates or Facebook with emails, socials and country filters.