TW Recent Posts Widget vs Facebook
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each widgets technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. Facebook has roughly 13283x more sites overall (1.3K vs 16.8M). But the split flips by market: TW Recent Posts Widget over-indexes in Russian Federation, South Africa and Slovakia, while Facebook runs the majority in Korea, United Arab Emirates and Singapore. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is TW Recent Posts Widget's 0% global share, so bars past it lean TW Recent Posts Widget.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for TW Recent Posts Widget
Build for Facebook
United States is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 1.4M Facebook sites to 98 on TW Recent Posts Widget, a 100% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose TW Recent Posts Widget if
- ✓You sell into Russian Federation, South Africa and Slovakia, where it has real traction.
- ✓You value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the TW Recent Posts Widget stack.
Choose Facebook if
- ✓You operate in Korea, United Arab Emirates and Singapore, its heartland.
- ✓You want the larger install base (16.8M sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Facebook stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using TW Recent Posts Widget or Facebook with emails, socials and country filters.