UberMenu vs Facebook
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each widgets technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. Facebook has roughly 488x more sites overall (34.4K vs 16.8M). But the split flips by market: UberMenu over-indexes in Iran, Malaysia and New Zealand, while Facebook runs the majority in Japan, Taiwan and Korea. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is UberMenu's 0% global share, so bars past it lean UberMenu.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for UberMenu
Build for Facebook
United States is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 1.4M Facebook sites to 6.3K on UberMenu, a 100% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose UberMenu if
- ✓You sell into Iran, Malaysia and New Zealand, where it has real traction.
- ✓You value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the UberMenu stack.
Choose Facebook if
- ✓You operate in Japan, Taiwan and Korea, its heartland.
- ✓You want the larger install base (16.8M sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Facebook stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using UberMenu or Facebook with emails, socials and country filters.