WP PostRatings vs Twitter
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each widgets technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. Twitter has roughly 369x more sites overall (23.1K vs 8.5M). But the split flips by market: WP PostRatings over-indexes in Russian Federation, Ukraine and Iran, while Twitter runs the majority in Korea, United Kingdom and United States. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is WP PostRatings's 0% global share, so bars past it lean WP PostRatings.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for WP PostRatings
Build for Twitter
United States is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 760K Twitter sites to 345 on WP PostRatings, a 100% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose WP PostRatings if
- ✓You sell into Russian Federation, Ukraine and Iran, where it has real traction.
- ✓You value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the WP PostRatings stack.
Choose Twitter if
- ✓You operate in Korea, United Kingdom and United States, its heartland.
- ✓You want the larger install base (8.5M sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Twitter stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using WP PostRatings or Twitter with emails, socials and country filters.