HeliumWeb vs Django
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each web frameworks technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. Django has roughly 15323x more sites overall (184 vs 2.8M). But the split flips by market: HeliumWeb over-indexes in Poland, France and Taiwan, while Django runs the majority in Czechia, India and Austria. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is HeliumWeb's 0% global share, so bars past it lean HeliumWeb.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for HeliumWeb
Build for Django
United States is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 263.3K Django sites to 10 on HeliumWeb, a 100% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose HeliumWeb if
- โYou sell into Poland, France and Taiwan, where it has real traction.
- โYou value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- โYour team is already invested in the HeliumWeb stack.
Choose Django if
- โYou operate in Czechia, India and Austria, its heartland.
- โYou want the larger install base (2.8M sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- โYour team is already invested in the Django stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using HeliumWeb or Django with socials, country and industry filters.