MediaWiki vs Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each content management system technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware has a similar number of sites overall (32K vs 42.2K). But the split flips by market: MediaWiki over-indexes in Israel, Germany and Poland, while Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware runs the majority in Viet Nam, New Zealand and Belgium. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is MediaWiki's 43% global share, so bars past it lean MediaWiki.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for MediaWiki
Build for Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware
Viet Nam is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 2.1K Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware sites to 87 on MediaWiki, a 96% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose MediaWiki if
- ✓You sell into Israel, Germany and Poland, where it has real traction.
- ✓You value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the MediaWiki stack.
Choose Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware if
- ✓You operate in Viet Nam, New Zealand and Belgium, its heartland.
- ✓You want the larger install base (42.2K sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using MediaWiki or Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware with socials, country and industry filters.