REDAXO vs Joomla
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each cms technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. Joomla has roughly 769x more sites overall (1.2K vs 900.2K). But the split flips by market: REDAXO over-indexes in Switzerland, Germany and Austria, while Joomla runs the majority in France, United Kingdom and Czechia. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is REDAXO's 0% global share, so bars past it lean REDAXO.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for REDAXO
Build for Joomla
Germany is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 134.6K Joomla sites to 845 on REDAXO, a 99% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose REDAXO if
- ✓You sell into Switzerland, Germany and Austria, where it has real traction.
- ✓You value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the REDAXO stack.
Choose Joomla if
- ✓You operate in France, United Kingdom and Czechia, its heartland.
- ✓You want the larger install base (900.2K sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Joomla stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using REDAXO or Joomla with socials, country and industry filters.