WikkaWiki vs Atlassian Confluence
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each wikis technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. Atlassian Confluence has roughly 87x more sites overall (232 vs 20.3K). But the split flips by market: WikkaWiki over-indexes in Germany and United Kingdom, while Atlassian Confluence runs the majority in France, United States and Canada. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is WikkaWiki's 1% global share, so bars past it lean WikkaWiki.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for WikkaWiki
Build for Atlassian Confluence
United States is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 2K Atlassian Confluence sites to 11 on WikkaWiki, a 99% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose WikkaWiki if
- ✓You sell into Germany and United Kingdom, where it has real traction.
- ✓You value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the WikkaWiki stack.
Choose Atlassian Confluence if
- ✓You operate in France, United States and Canada, its heartland.
- ✓You want the larger install base (20.3K sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Atlassian Confluence stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using WikkaWiki or Atlassian Confluence with socials, country and industry filters.