Autotask vs WordPress
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each cms technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. WordPress has roughly 29189x more sites overall (517 vs 15.1M). But the split flips by market: Autotask over-indexes in United States, New Zealand and Canada, while WordPress runs the majority in Japan, Poland and India. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is Autotask's 0% global share, so bars past it lean Autotask.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for Autotask
Build for WordPress
Germany is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 1.1M WordPress sites to 10 on Autotask, a 100% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose Autotask if
- โYou sell into United States, New Zealand and Canada, where it has real traction.
- โYou value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- โYour team is already invested in the Autotask stack.
Choose WordPress if
- โYou operate in Japan, Poland and India, its heartland.
- โYou want the larger install base (15.1M sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- โYour team is already invested in the WordPress stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using Autotask or WordPress with socials, country and industry filters.