Deviant Art vs Facebook Redirect
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each link technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. Facebook Redirect has roughly 325x more sites overall (51.7K vs 16.8M). But the split flips by market: Deviant Art over-indexes in China, Viet Nam and Indonesia, while Facebook Redirect runs the majority in Korea, Israel and Australia. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is Deviant Art's 0% global share, so bars past it lean Deviant Art.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for Deviant Art
Build for Facebook Redirect
United States is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 1.4M Facebook Redirect sites to 1.4K on Deviant Art, a 100% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose Deviant Art if
- ✓You sell into China, Viet Nam and Indonesia, where it has real traction.
- ✓You value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Deviant Art stack.
Choose Facebook Redirect if
- ✓You operate in Korea, Israel and Australia, its heartland.
- ✓You want the larger install base (16.8M sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Facebook Redirect stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using Deviant Art or Facebook Redirect with socials, country and industry filters.