Euromoney Institutional Investor vs Facebook
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each link technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. Facebook has roughly 220860x more sites overall (76 vs 16.8M). But the split flips by market: Euromoney Institutional Investor over-indexes in China, United Kingdom and Portugal, while Facebook runs the majority in Germany, France and Italy. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is Euromoney Institutional Investor's 0% global share, so bars past it lean Euromoney Institutional Investor.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for Euromoney Institutional Investor
Build for Facebook
United States is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 1.4M Facebook sites to 7 on Euromoney Institutional Investor, a 100% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose Euromoney Institutional Investor if
- ✓You sell into China, United Kingdom and Portugal, where it has real traction.
- ✓You value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Euromoney Institutional Investor stack.
Choose Facebook if
- ✓You operate in Germany, France and Italy, its heartland.
- ✓You want the larger install base (16.8M sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Facebook stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using Euromoney Institutional Investor or Facebook with socials, country and industry filters.