Glofox vs Facebook
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each widgets technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. Facebook has roughly 21845x more sites overall (774 vs 16.9M). But the split flips by market: Glofox over-indexes in Singapore, Ireland and United Arab Emirates, while Facebook runs the majority in Germany, Italy and Poland. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is Glofox's 0% global share, so bars past it lean Glofox.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for Glofox
Build for Facebook
United States is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 1.5M Facebook sites to 103 on Glofox, a 100% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose Glofox if
- ✓You sell into Singapore, Ireland and United Arab Emirates, where it has real traction.
- ✓You value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Glofox stack.
Choose Facebook if
- ✓You operate in Germany, Italy and Poland, its heartland.
- ✓You want the larger install base (16.9M sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Facebook stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using Glofox or Facebook with socials, country and industry filters.