LET Group vs eSyndiCat
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each cms technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. eSyndiCat has roughly 17x more sites overall (91K vs 1.6M). But the split flips by market: LET Group over-indexes in Denmark, Norway and United States, while eSyndiCat runs the majority in Timor-Leste, Japan and Taiwan. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is LET Group's 5% global share, so bars past it lean LET Group.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for LET Group
Build for eSyndiCat
Russian Federation is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 41.1K eSyndiCat sites to 3K on LET Group, a 93% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose LET Group if
- ✓You sell into Denmark, Norway and United States, where it has real traction.
- ✓You value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the LET Group stack.
Choose eSyndiCat if
- ✓You operate in Timor-Leste, Japan and Taiwan, its heartland.
- ✓You want the larger install base (1.6M sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the eSyndiCat stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using LET Group or eSyndiCat with socials, country and industry filters.