LiveEdit vs Youtube Channel
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each cms technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. Youtube Channel has roughly 53878x more sites overall (153 vs 8.2M). But the split flips by market: LiveEdit over-indexes in Ireland, United States and Denmark, while Youtube Channel runs the majority in Germany, Netherlands and Brazil. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is LiveEdit's 0% global share, so bars past it lean LiveEdit.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for LiveEdit
Build for Youtube Channel
United States is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 680.5K Youtube Channel sites to 32 on LiveEdit, a 100% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose LiveEdit if
- ✓You sell into Ireland, United States and Denmark, where it has real traction.
- ✓You value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the LiveEdit stack.
Choose Youtube Channel if
- ✓You operate in Germany, Netherlands and Brazil, its heartland.
- ✓You want the larger install base (8.2M sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Youtube Channel stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using LiveEdit or Youtube Channel with socials, country and industry filters.