Members Page vs Facebook Redirect
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each link technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. Facebook Redirect has roughly 4.7x more sites overall (3.6M vs 16.8M). But the split flips by market: Members Page over-indexes in Korea, China and Hong Kong, while Facebook Redirect runs the majority in Poland, Slovakia and Hungary. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is Members Page's 17% global share, so bars past it lean Members Page.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for Members Page
Build for Facebook Redirect
Germany is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 935.6K Facebook Redirect sites to 80K on Members Page, a 92% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose Members Page if
- ✓You sell into Korea, China and Hong Kong, where it has real traction.
- ✓You value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Members Page stack.
Choose Facebook Redirect if
- ✓You operate in Poland, Slovakia and Hungary, its heartland.
- ✓You want the larger install base (16.8M sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Facebook Redirect stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using Members Page or Facebook Redirect with socials, country and industry filters.