Mura vs eSyndiCat
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each cms technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. eSyndiCat has roughly 14x more sites overall (116.1K vs 1.6M). But the split flips by market: Mura over-indexes in Japan, Italy and Romania, while eSyndiCat runs the majority in Timor-Leste, Korea and Pakistan. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is Mura's 7% global share, so bars past it lean Mura.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for Mura
Build for eSyndiCat
Russian Federation is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 41.1K eSyndiCat sites to 873 on Mura, a 98% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose Mura if
- ✓You sell into Japan, Italy and Romania, where it has real traction.
- ✓You value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Mura stack.
Choose eSyndiCat if
- ✓You operate in Timor-Leste, Korea and Pakistan, its heartland.
- ✓You want the larger install base (1.6M sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the eSyndiCat stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using Mura or eSyndiCat with socials, country and industry filters.