Sedna System vs Facebook
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each widgets technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. Facebook has roughly 839270x more sites overall (20 vs 16.8M). But the split flips by market: Sedna System over-indexes in Sweden, Spain and Poland, while Facebook runs the majority in United States, Germany and Canada. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is Sedna System's 0% global share, so bars past it lean Sedna System.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for Sedna System
Build for Facebook
United States is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 1.4M Facebook sites to 0 on Sedna System, a 100% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose Sedna System if
- ✓You sell into Sweden, Spain and Poland, where it has real traction.
- ✓You value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Sedna System stack.
Choose Facebook if
- ✓You operate in United States, Germany and Canada, its heartland.
- ✓You want the larger install base (16.8M sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Facebook stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using Sedna System or Facebook with socials, country and industry filters.