SiteOrigin Panels vs Facebook
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each widgets technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. Facebook has roughly 87x more sites overall (193.8K vs 16.8M). But the split flips by market: SiteOrigin Panels over-indexes in Serbia, Japan and Finland, while Facebook runs the majority in Korea, Israel and Taiwan. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is SiteOrigin Panels's 1% global share, so bars past it lean SiteOrigin Panels.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for SiteOrigin Panels
Build for Facebook
United States is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 1.4M Facebook sites to 14.8K on SiteOrigin Panels, a 99% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose SiteOrigin Panels if
- ✓You sell into Serbia, Japan and Finland, where it has real traction.
- ✓You value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the SiteOrigin Panels stack.
Choose Facebook if
- ✓You operate in Korea, Israel and Taiwan, its heartland.
- ✓You want the larger install base (16.8M sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Facebook stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using SiteOrigin Panels or Facebook with socials, country and industry filters.