Wikispaces vs eSyndiCat
A side by side look at reach, regional footprint and where each cms technology actually wins, built from live detections across millions of websites.
The short version. eSyndiCat has roughly 361x more sites overall (4.4K vs 1.6M). But the split flips by market: Wikispaces over-indexes in New Zealand, United States and Spain, while eSyndiCat runs the majority in Pakistan, Hong Kong and Japan. Which one fits depends far more on your market than on raw totals.
Head to head
Where each technology comes out ahead, by dimension
Who leads each market
Share of the two technologies per country. The marker is Wikispaces's 0% global share, so bars past it lean Wikispaces.
Where to build
Building an app, theme or agency around one technology? This is where its sites actually concentrate.
Build for Wikispaces
Build for eSyndiCat
Russian Federation is the most one-sided market in this comparison: 41.1K eSyndiCat sites to 10 on Wikispaces, a 100% split. For a new project there, the ecosystem, plugins and talent all point one way.
Which should you choose
A quick read based on reach and regional traction
Choose Wikispaces if
- ✓You sell into New Zealand, United States and Spain, where it has real traction.
- ✓You value where it concentrates its footprint over sheer volume.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the Wikispaces stack.
Choose eSyndiCat if
- ✓You operate in Pakistan, Hong Kong and Japan, its heartland.
- ✓You want the larger install base (1.6M sites) and a bigger ecosystem.
- ✓Your team is already invested in the eSyndiCat stack.
Export the websites behind either technology
Get the sites using Wikispaces or eSyndiCat with socials, country and industry filters.